Beneath the rocky mountains near Qom, Iran, lies the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant—a facility so deeply buried and heavily fortified that it has become nearly immune to conventional military attack. Fordow isn’t just another uranium enrichment site; it is the crown jewel of Iran’s nuclear defense strategy, built to resist bombs, pressure, and international scrutiny alike.
Once a part of Iran’s covert Amad Project, Fordow was designed from the ground up to enrich uranium in secret and to survive even if discovered. It was only revealed to the world in 2009 after exposure by Western intelligence. Since then, it has remained a symbol of Iran’s nuclear defiance and strategic engineering.
The Fordow plant is located roughly 300 feet underground, shielded by reinforced concrete and a mountain range. Inside, it houses over 3,000 centrifuges, including the advanced IR-6 models, enabling uranium enrichment far beyond civilian energy needs.
As of 2025, Iran is enriching uranium at Fordow up to 60% purity—just shy of the 90% needed for weapons-grade material. This progress drastically shortens Iran’s breakout time, raising alarm bells around the world.
More than just a lab, Fordow is a bunker with thick underground shielding, electromagnetic resistance, maze-like internal architecture, and surface-to-air defense systems, including Russian-made S-300 missiles. It’s a site designed for survival—not diplomacy.
To penetrate deep underground targets, the United States has developed specialized bunker-busting bombs.
GBU-28 Bunker Buster
Weight: ~5,000 lbs
Penetration: ~100 feet of earth or 20 feet of concrete
Verdict: Too weak for Fordow
GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP)
Weight: 30,000 lbs
Penetration: over 200 feet of reinforced concrete or rock
Delivered by stealth B-2 Spirit bombers
Verdict: Might work—but still not enough
Even with the MOP, Fordow may be too deep, too fortified, and too compartmentalized to fully destroy. Experts suggest multiple MOP strikes would be needed, backed by real-time intelligence and airspace control. Still, success is far from guaranteed.
In June 2025, Israel launched precision airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, including Natanz and above-ground structures at Fordow. While Natanz took a hit, Fordow’s underground core remained untouched. Post-strike analysis by the IAEA confirmed that uranium enrichment activities continued unaffected.
Fordow had passed the test. Its depth, design, and defenses had made it virtually strike-proof.
If bunker busters can’t reach Fordow, there remains one chilling alternative: tactical nuclear weapons.
These are not Hiroshima-style city-destroyers but low-yield nukes designed to obliterate hardened military targets with precision and limited fallout. The most likely candidate for such a strike would be the B61 Mod 11.
B61 Mod 11 Tactical Nuclear Bomb
-
Type: Earth-penetrating nuclear gravity bomb
-
Warhead yield: Selectable from sub-kiloton levels to approximately 340 kilotons
-
Deployment: Dropped from high-altitude bombers such as the B-2 Spirit
-
Primary purpose: Destroy deeply buried, hardened targets including command bunkers and fortified enrichment facilities
The B61 Mod 11 works by burrowing into the ground before detonation. Its subterranean explosion generates a powerful shockwave and heat surge capable of vaporizing reinforced concrete, collapsing tunnels, and destroying facilities hundreds of feet below the surface.
In the case of Fordow, a single Mod 11, if accurately placed, could likely completely annihilate the underground centrifuge halls. Even if structural destruction wasn’t total, the facility would be rendered inoperable due to radiation, seismic damage, and heat stress.
Strategic Considerations for Use
Despite its effectiveness, deploying a tactical nuke would come at an immense cost:
-
First use of a nuclear weapon in warfare since 1945, setting a dangerous precedent
-
Immediate and overwhelming global condemnation, including from allies
-
Shattering of nuclear non-proliferation norms and likely collapse of the NPT
-
Risk of escalation into regional war, particularly with Iranian proxy forces
-
Uncontrolled environmental and humanitarian fallout, depending on blast depth, wind direction, and local population
The radioactive plume, while localized compared to larger strategic bombs, would still contaminate the area for decades and could drift into populated regions if not properly contained.
In short, while the B61 Mod 11 would likely succeed where conventional bombs fail, the political, moral, and ecological consequences would be profound and irreversible.
Visual Comparison: How Deep Is Fordow?
Fordow Facility: ~300 feet
GBU-28 Bunker Buster: ~100 feet
GBU-57 MOP: ~200+ feet
B61 Mod 11 Tactical Nuke: 300+ feet via shockwave and vaporization
Fordow wasn’t just built to enrich uranium—it was built to force the world to hesitate. Every bomb that might be needed to destroy it carries with it not just explosive power, but the weight of political, moral, and strategic consequences.
Its depth is not just a measurement of geology—but of diplomacy, restraint, and risk.
The question now isn’t just whether the U.S. can destroy Fordow—but whether the world is willing to pay the price to even try.
